October 30, 2007
Rangel Introduces AMT Repeal, Tax Reform
Administration Opposes Revised SCHIP Bill
Appropriations Update
Farm Bill Faces Contentious Floor Debate
BUDGET PROCESS STEP-BY-STEP™
Note: Federal Government agencies are currently operating under a continuing resolution (H.J. Res. 52) allowing Federal programs, projects, and activities to continue operating at FY 2007 spending levels through November 16.
This Week:
Today and balance of the week: The Senate plans to vote on the revised SCHIP bill (H.R. 3963) by the end of the week;
Conferees to meet on Labor-HHS-Education and Defense spending bills;
Senate to vote on Amtrak reauthorization (S. 294);
Wednesday 10/31: Senate Budget Committee hearing on Conrad-Gregg entitlement commission.
Last Week:
Tuesday 10/23: Senate passed Labor-HHS-Education (H.R. 3043) by a vote of 75-19;
Thursday 10/25: House passed revised SCHIP bill (H.R. 3963) by a vote of 265-142;
Senate Agriculture Committee marked up the Farm Bill.
RANGEL SAYS 2007 ONE-YEAR AMT “PATCH” SHOULD BE PAID FOR;
INTRODUCES FULL REPEAL, TAX REFORM PACKAGE
Last Thursday, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY) introduced H.R. 3970, a $1.3 trillion tax reform package including a full repeal of the Alternative Minimum Tax. (Bill Summary) However, Rangel acknowledges that for 2007, action is likely to be limited to a one-year AMT patch (plus extension of various expiring tax provisions such as the R&E tax credit and deduction for sales tax).
To PAYGO, or not to PAYGO: An
immediate issue is how to pay for the 2007 patch and tax extenders in
order to comply with Congress' PAYGO rules (which require that tax cuts
be paid for with offsetting revenue raisers or entitlement spending
cuts). A one-year AMT patch would cost $50 billion while the extenders
are estimated at $21 billion. (The Senate Finance Committee is also
considering tax extenders at an estimated cost of $15-$20 billion.) Ways
& Means Ranking Republican Jim McCrery (R-LA) said Republicans
oppose PAYGO and want to enact a patch and extenders without offsets,
but Rangel reiterated his intention yesterday on PBS' NewsHour to abide by PAYGO, one of the principal reforms adopted by House Democrats when they became the majority party. (Rangel Release) (Context: Because
AMT relief expired at the end of 2006, any extension of AMT relief for
2007 is considered under congressional budget rules to be a new tax
cut.)
[Context on AMT: The AMT was
enacted in 1969 to preclude wealthy individuals from escaping all tax
liability due to tax loopholes. It operates as an alternative calculation of income tax liability which cancels out various deductions, exclusions, and tax preferences. Taxpayers are required to pay the higher of AMT tax liability and regular income tax liability. However, upper-middle and middle-income taxpayers are increasingly finding themselves subject to the AMT—for two reasons. First, while the regular income tax is indexed for inflation, the AMT is not. Second ,
recent income tax rate reductions have narrowed the differences between
regular and AMT tax liabilities. The Treasury Department now projects
that 25 million taxpayers will be subject to the AMT in 2007 without
repeal or enactment of a one-year patch. (Treasury Release)]
Highlights of Rangel Tax Package:
Tax Cuts
• Permanent repeal of AMT
• Increase standard deduction
• Expand earned income and child tax credits
• Reduce corporate tax rate from 35% to 30.5%
Tax Increases to Pay for AMT Repeal and other Tax Cuts
• 4 percent surtax on income over $200,000; and 4.6 percent on income over $500,000 (filing jointly)
• Higher rates for hedge funds and private equity
• Prevent use of overseas tax havens to shield income from taxation
• Repeal various business tax breaks
Republicans have strongly criticized the tax increases included to pay for the Rangel tax package.
Statement from House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH)
Statement from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
However, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates
that while 1.7 million taxpayers would see a net increase in taxes,
nearly 92 million taxpayers would receive a net tax cut. (JCT Estimate)
ADMINISTRATION SAYS REVISED SCHIP BILL DOESN'T GO FAR ENOUGH
Last Thursday, October 25, the House a revised SCHIP bill (H.R. 3963) by a vote of 265-142,
still 7 votes short of a veto-proof margin. The bill comes just one
week after the House failed to override the President's veto of a
House-Senate compromise bill. The revised bill includes several
revisions aimed at attracting additional Republican votes:
-capping eligibility at 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL);
-strengthening language to prevent illegal immigrants from receiving benefits; and
-including language to accelerate phasing out childless adults from receiving benefits.
The administration remains opposed to the SCHIP legislation. (October 25 Administration statement) However, key Republican Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) released a statement praising the revised bill and calling it an improvement over the original House- and Senate-passed bill.
The President's proposal to cap SCHIP assistance at 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level is much stricter than current law. 19
States-- with Administration approval-- currently cover children in
families earning more than 200 percent above the FPL (ranging from West
VA at 220 percent to New Jersey at 350 percent of FPL).
The rationale for the flexibility of current law
is that in New Jersey , for example, a family of four with two working
parents earning 300 percent of the poverty level ($61,950) is unlikely
to find affordable health insurance.
Consequently, supporters of the bill, both Democratic and Republican, argue that the President's proposed reauthorization would reduce the number of low-income children currently covered by SCHIP.
[Context: SCHIP was established
in 1997 and provides health coverage to children in families whose
incomes are low, but somewhat higher than Medicaid's very tight income
eligibility limits. The program operates similar to Medicaid with
Federal reimbursements for a percentage of State expenditures to provide
health coverage for eligible children.]
Revised CBO Cost Estimate
APPROPRIATIONS UPDATE
Congressional Democrats and the President are
currently locked in a face-off over appropriations levels, with
Congress' Budget Resolution calling for $22 billion more in non-defense
discretionary spending than the President's FY 2008 Budget request. The
President has threatened to veto 9 of 12 appropriations bills.
Democratic congressional leaders are debating
which bills to send to the President first. One possibility is linking
the Labor-HHS-Education bill with Defense and/or MilCon-VA. In a press release, the American Legion says that Senate Majority Leader Reid promised to send the bill to the President before Veterans' Day.
Following vetoes and political posturing,
negotiations will likely begin on an omnibus appropriations package--
negotiations that could well last into December.
Status of pending appropriations:
Agriculture/HR 3161: House bill $982 million over President's request; Senate-reported bill $874 million over President's request; White House threatened a veto on July 31. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: House bill includes provision
allowing individuals and pharmacies to import prescription drugs from
Canada and other countries.]
Commerce-Justice-Science/HR 3093: House bill $2.31 billion over President's request; Senate bill $4.2 billion over President's request; White House has threatened to veto the House and Senate bills. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: Senate bill provides
additional $350 million for Commerce and nearly $400 million more for
Justice. On the Floor, a Biden amendment provided an additional $110
million for the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program. (Biden Release)
Senate also passed a Mikulski Floor amendment to include an additional
$1 billion to reimburse NASA for costs from the Columbia crash that led
to program cuts. (Mikulski Release)]
Defense/HR 3222: House bill $3.29 billion under President's request; Senate-reported base bill (excluding emergency border security) $3.58 billion under President's
request. No veto threat. Like MilCon-VA, Congressional Democrats are
likely to hold off on sending the Defense bill to the President, instead
using it as vehicle to negotiate other bills' passage. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: House bill includes language
restricting torture and permanent bases in Iraq, provides $2.8 billion
more for transport ship and Stryker vehicles, and would appropriate
additional $270 million for satellites and GPS programs. Senate bill
includes nearly $3.8 billion in emergency spending for border security,
and provides additional $500 million for military health care programs.]
Energy-Water/HR 2641: House bill $1.13 billion over President's request; Senate-reported bill $800 million over President's request; White House threatened a veto on June 13. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: Senate bill provides
additional $760 million for National Nuclear Security Administration.
House bill provides $200 million more for renewable energy programs.]
Financial Services/HR 2829: House bill $244 million under President's request; Senate-reported bill $122 million over President's request; White House threatened a veto on June 26 because of provisions that would “weaken current [trade] restrictions against Cuba .” House Summary Senate Summary
Homeland Security/HR 2638: House bill $2.06 billion over President's request; Senate bill $5.25 billion over President's request; White House has threatened to veto the House and Senate bills. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: House bill provides over $200
million more for FEMA. Senate added $3 billion of emergency funding for
border security.]
Interior-Environment/HR 2643: House bill $1.95 billion over President's request; Senate-reported bill $1.498 billion over President's request; White House threatened a veto on June 25. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: House bill appropriates $300 million more for the EPA, mostly in the form of state assistance grants.]
Labor-HHS-Education/HR 3043: Last Tuesday, October 23, the Senate passed the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations (H.R. 3043) by a vote of 75-19.
The bill would provide $149.9 billion, which is $9 billion more than
the President's request. House bill $10.83 billion over President's
request; White House has threatened to veto the House and Senate bills. House and Senate begin conferencing this week. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: The House bill includes
additional $500 million for low-income home energy assistance (LIHEAP)
and $500 million more for grants to low income schools. The Senate would
provide an additional $250 million for NIH. Senate Floor amendments
include additional $150 million for Social Security.]
Legislative Branch/HR 2771: House
bill $3.1 billion; Senate-reported bill $2.8 billion; President
requested $4.33 billion (combined), White House has not threatened a
veto. [Context: The House and Senate do not consider the spending of the other chamber until conference.] House Summary Senate Summary
MilCon-VA/HR 2642: House bill $4
billion over President's request; Senate bill $4 billion over
President's request; White House has not threatened a veto but insists on offsets in other spending bills. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: The House bill would provide
$196 million more than the Senate for medical programs; the Senate bill
would provide $177 million more than the House for base construction and
closings. The Senate bill also includes $100 million in emergency funds
for security at 2008 political conventions.]
State-Foreign Ops/HR 2764: House bill $700 million under President's request; Senate bill $720 million under President's request; White House has threatened to veto the House and Senate bills. [Context: Despite coming in under the President's request, both bills face veto
threats because of language that would overturn a policy barring U.S.
funding for any international organization that performs abortions
overseas.] House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: House bill provides $600
million more than the Senate for the Millennium Challenge Corporation,
which provides competitive grants to nations engaged in democratic
reforms.]
Transportation-HUD/HR 3074: House bill $2.77 billion over President's request; Senate bill $3.1 billion over President's request; White House has threatened to veto the House and Senate bills. House Summary Senate Summary
[Conference Issues: The House would provide $228
million more than the Senate for Community Development Block Grants. The
Senate bill includes an additional $1 billion for bridge repair and
maintenance.]
FARM BILL PASSES SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE, CONTENTIOUS FLOOR DEBATE AHEAD
Last Thursday, the Senate Agriculture Committee unanimously approved the Farm Bill in a voice vote. The reauthorization bill, expected to cost around $238
billion, follows months of negotiations by Agriculture Chairman Tom
Harkin (D-IA), Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT), Budget Chairman Kent
Conrad (D-ND), and Agriculture Ranking Member Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) who
supported Conrad's efforts to maintain current subsidies. Although
garnering unanimous support, the committee avoided many of the bill's
controversial provisions, leaving them to be addressed when the bill
reaches the floor. (Harkin Release)
Most notably, the bill is expected to face
opposition for $5 billion that would go towards a disaster relief fund.
The fund was a key provision in S. 2242,
a bill approved earlier by the Senate Finance committee. S. 2242, an
agriculture tax package, includes $5.1 billion for the disaster relief
fund, $7.5 billion for conservation provisions and another $2 billion
for energy tax credits and incentives, totaling to nearly $16 billion.
The package provides several different funding sources, including tariff
revenues and codifying the “economic substance doctrine,” relating to
business tax shelters. (Baucus Release)
Another possibly contentious issue is Chairman
Harkin's Average Crop Revenue (ACR) program, an optional program that
would tie counter-cyclical farmer relief payments to state crop revenues
instead of national revenues. The new program is expected to save $3 to
$3.5 billion over 5 years and would allow farmers to opt for the crop
revenue-based subsidies or continue with the existing system.
The Senate is expected to begin consideration of the Farm Bill next week.
[Context: The "Farm Bill,"
renewed every 5 to 6 years, governs the key aspects of Federal farm
policy. Many provisions of the current Farm Bill, enacted in 2002,
expired this year. The 2002 bill covers a wide range of programs. Those
with the greatest budget impact are (1) Food Stamps; (2) Commodity
Support programs (government subsidies to producers of certain farm
commodities--primarily corn, cotton, wheat, rice, and soybeans--intended
to stabilize farm income); (3) Agricultural Conservation programs
(payments and incentives addressing environmental concerns, soil erosion
and water supplies);and (4) Export promotion programs.]
NEW BUDGET DOCS
CBO: Testimony on Estimated Costs of U.S. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and of Other Activities Related to the War on Terrorism
CBO: Testimony on Public Spending on Surface Transportation Infrastructure
GAO: Federal
Electricity Subsidies: Information on Research Funding, Tax
Expenditures, and Other Activities That Support Electricity Production
GAO: 2010 Census: Population Measures Are Important for Federal Funding Allocations
|